Designfinds: Design and furniture trading
Background
As a vintage deco and furniture enthusiast I was often disappointed by trading platforms that are already existing and that either lack functionalities or that I associate with frustration.
​
I decided to work on an upgraded version of a trading website for those products, combining already existing features, taking different elements from different sites and adding my own touch.
​
The main challenge was to find what the main problems were on existing platforms while asking users and to find solutions that made sense
​
​
​
Problems to solve- assumptions
- Bidding is often just for generalistic websites like ebay
- Categorizations are too generalistic
- No or too little filters like time periods
- You end up using eBay all the time
​
​
​
Methods that I used
- User research
- Market research and best practices
- User Interviews
- Ideation
- Wireframing
- Prototyping
- Usabiltiy testing
​
​
​
Research
1. Best practices used by similar platforms/sites
​
- Information architecture
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
- Photos/Images
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
- Navigation bars/ search
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
- Categorization
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
2. User/ market research
​
Main findings:
​
- Second hand purchases are done by every existing social class
- Those aged 25 to 64 are the most likely to have purchased second-hand books and furniture.
- Ebay is the most popular place to buy second-hand items online
- Women are more likely to buy different types of second-hand items
- The channels and reasons for choosing used items differ by age group and gender.
- Second hand is mostly bought online
​
​
​
Main problems to solve
-
24 questions
-
three participants
-
Zoom, phone and face to face
-
Age: 27 to 33 years old
​
Findings:
​
-
The importance of photos
-
Categorizations are always bad or unsufficient
-
You do not always get what you see
-
Product information are a big plus and are often lacking
-
Getting to the right time period is difficult
-
Contacting a seller should be easy
-
Sellers' rating matter a lot in order to decide for or against a purchase
-
Payment should be easy and fast, PayPal is a must have
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
User interviews
-
Too little product information like dimensions
-
Often bad photos= you dont' get what you see
-
Too little or inconsistent categorization
-
Either bidding or buy now, rarely both
-
Seller's rating + messaging doesn't exist for every platform
​
​
​
​
Ideation
Main functionalities
​
- Accurate and precise product categorization
- Detailed filters with era selection
- Products photos with details in different angles
- Seller rating option
- Message function to contact sellers​
Wireframing
Paper sketching
Low fidelity wireframing on Figma
High fidelity Prototyping
Home page
​
​
​
​
Product details
​
​
​
Contact page
​
​
​
Product page
​
​
​
​
THE FEATURES​
​
​
​
- Precise selection possibilities
​
​
​
-
Price Range
-
Distance selection option
-
Condition selection
-
Type of trading
-
Design style and era with precise categories
- Photo carousel in every angle
​
​
​
Detailled photos with different angles enable to see all flaws and to see the product as clearly as it is possible to do
- Buy now / Bidd
​
​
​
The sites enables buy now options as well as bidding as research showed that price is a big factor in second hand purchases
​
The number of views is also something that shows how popular the object is and is a plus for users
​
Seller's review with last connection to help the users
​
Send message and place bid buttons
- Diverse payment options and delivery options
​
​
​
-
National and international shipment
-
Diverse Shipment options
-
Paypal
-
Classic payment methods
​
​
- Rating options and seller contact
​
​
​
-
Accurate and precise information about the seller
-
Possibility to get in touch with seller rapidly
-
Layout enables the users to have an overview on the reviews on one page
-
All those information help the user's to feel in safe hands
-
Secured process
​
Prototyping
Prototyping and testing
The different connections between the site's pages for the prototyping on Figma
UI Choices
-
Minimalistic design and colors
-
Simple but elegant font
-
Pale and neutral aesthetics that fit to the target audience
-
Keep it simple
Clean and geometrical Logo that remembers the world of design and minimalistic aesthetics​
Simple font that fits the target and the products
​
Font Name: Maax
Grey minimalistic colors for titles, backgrounds and buttons
Usability testing and results
-
Three participants
-
Done at my home and assistant, one done via phone
​
Tasks:
​
-
Choosing one product that is available on the website
-
Contacting the seller and checking his ratings
-
Placing a bid for some products
-
Going for a chair in Scandinavian minimalism and going through the process
​
Results and takeaways:
​
-
Some technical issues with prototyping and getting to the right pages had to be fixed
-
Some buttons did not work correctly and had to be optimized
-
Fonts were partly too small
-
Overall the parcipants liked the aesthetics, the minimalism, the categorization
-
Excellent User Experience
​
​
​
​
​
Challenges and pitfalls
-
Two weeks timeframe for the project requires to focus on the main functions
-
Prioritization in terms of pages was key
-
Being a user oneself is a bias and it is important to listen to other users
-
User testing was a bit too little and could have been expanded