top of page

Designfinds: Design and furniture trading

Background

As a vintage deco and furniture enthusiast I was often disappointed by trading platforms that are already existing and that either lack functionalities or that I associate with frustration.

​

I decided to work on an upgraded version of a trading website for those products, combining already existing features, taking different elements from different sites and adding my own touch.

​

The main challenge was to find what the main problems were on existing platforms while asking users and to find solutions that made sense

​

​

​

Problems to solve- assumptions

- Bidding is often just for generalistic websites like ebay

- Categorizations are too generalistic

- No or too little filters like time periods

- You end up using eBay all the time 

​

​

​

Methods that I used

-  User research 

-  Market research and best practices

-  User Interviews

-  Ideation

-  Wireframing

- Prototyping

- Usabiltiy testing

​

​

​

Research

1. Best practices used by similar platforms/sites

​

- Information architecture

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

- Photos/Images

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

- Navigation bars/ search 

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

- Categorization

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

2. User/ market research

​

Main findings:

​

- Second hand purchases are done by every existing social class 

- Those aged 25 to 64 are the most likely to have purchased second-hand books and furniture.

- Ebay is the most popular place to buy second-hand items online

- Women are more likely to buy different types of second-hand items

- The channels and reasons for choosing used items differ by age group and gender.

- Second hand is mostly bought online

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.33.26.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.33.34.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.45.34.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.32.34.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.32.14.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 15.32.52.png
Main problems to solve
  • 24 questions

  • three participants

  • Zoom, phone and face to face

  • Age: 27 to 33 years old

​

Findings:

​

  • The importance of photos

  • Categorizations are always bad or unsufficient

  • You do not always get what you see

  • Product information are a big plus and are often lacking

  • Getting to the right time period is difficult

  • Contacting a seller should be easy

  • Sellers' rating matter a lot in order to decide for or against a purchase

  • Payment should be easy and fast, PayPal is a must have

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

229458693_929091897820609_7588236004383701706_n (1).jpg
229803145_440790260314576_7564909013235471099_n (1).jpg
User interviews
 
  • Too little product information like dimensions

  • Often bad photos= you dont' get what you see

  • Too little or inconsistent categorization

  • Either bidding or buy now, rarely both

  • Seller's rating + messaging doesn't exist for every platform

​

​

​

​

Ideation
 

Main functionalities

​

- Accurate and precise product categorization

- Detailed filters with era selection

- Products photos with details in different angles

- Seller rating option

- Message function to contact sellers​

Wireframing
 

Paper sketching

Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 14.44.07.png

Low fidelity wireframing  on Figma

Capture d’écran 2021-08-09 à 14.51.47.png
High fidelity Prototyping
 

Home page

​

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.05.56.png

Product details

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.13.31.png

Contact page

​

​

​

Product page

​

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.06.10.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.15.19.png

THE FEATURES​

​

​

​

- Precise selection possibilities

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.16.10.png
  • Price Range

  • Distance selection option

  • Condition selection

  • Type of trading

  • Design style and era with precise categories

- Photo carousel in every angle

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.14.59.png

Detailled photos with different angles enable to see all flaws and to see the product as clearly as it is possible to do

Capture d’écran 2021-08-17 à 14.14.02.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 14.32.06.png

- Buy now / Bidd

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 14.32.24.png

The sites enables buy now options as well as bidding as research showed that price is a big factor in second hand purchases

​

The number of views is also something that shows how popular the object is and is a plus for users

​

Seller's review with last connection to help the users

​

Send message and place bid buttons

Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 14.37.55.png

- Diverse payment options and delivery options

​

​

​

  • National and international shipment

  • Diverse Shipment options

  • Paypal

  • Classic payment methods

​

​

- Rating options and seller contact

​

​

​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 15.23.55.png
  • Accurate and precise information about the seller

  • Possibility to get in touch with seller rapidly

  • Layout enables the users to have an overview on the reviews on one page

  • All those information help the user's to feel in safe hands

  • Secured process

​

Prototyping
 
Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 15.27.24.png
Prototyping and testing
 

The different connections between the site's pages for the prototyping on Figma

UI Choices
 
  • Minimalistic design and colors

  • Simple but elegant font

  • Pale and neutral aesthetics that fit to the target audience

  • Keep it simple

Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 17.52.12.png

Clean and geometrical Logo that remembers the world of design and minimalistic aesthetics​

Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 17.52.03.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 17.51.46.png
Capture d’écran 2021-08-18 à 17.51.28.png

Simple font that fits the target and the products

​

Font Name: Maax

Grey minimalistic colors for titles, backgrounds and buttons 

Usability testing and results
  • Three participants

  • Done at my home and assistant, one done via phone

​

Tasks:

​

  • Choosing one product that is available on the website

  • Contacting the seller and checking his ratings

  • Placing a bid for some products

  • Going for a chair in Scandinavian minimalism and going through the process

​

Results and takeaways:

​

  • Some technical issues with prototyping and getting to the right pages had to be fixed

  • Some buttons did not work correctly and had to be optimized

  • Fonts were partly too small

  • Overall the parcipants liked the aesthetics, the minimalism, the categorization

  • Excellent User Experience

​

​

​

​

​

Challenges and pitfalls
 
  • Two weeks timeframe for  the project requires to focus on the main functions

  • Prioritization in terms of pages was key

  • Being a user oneself is a bias and it is important to listen to other users

  • User testing was a bit too little and could have been expanded

bottom of page